Political Cocaine: How America Became Addicted to the Two-Party System and Solutions for Change - Essential Reading for Political Science Students & Civic Engagement Advocates
Political Cocaine: How America Became Addicted to the Two-Party System and Solutions for Change - Essential Reading for Political Science Students & Civic Engagement Advocates

Political Cocaine: How America Became Addicted to the Two-Party System and Solutions for Change - Essential Reading for Political Science Students & Civic Engagement Advocates

$7.12 $12.95 -45% OFF

Free shipping on all orders over $50

7-15 days international

30 people viewing this product right now!

30-day free returns

Secure checkout

47011768

Guranteed safe checkout
amex
paypal
discover
mastercard
visa
apple pay

Description

American consumers demand choice. The assortment of products in American stores is beyond belief to anyone from the Third World. So why are only two choices for anything political acceptable to Americans?It seems totally illogical. It reminds me of the illogical change in behavior of an addict. These are people who are normal in seemingly every way yet give up everything and everyone in their lives for a drug which is a short-term high, and self-destructive. How can that be? Research has convinced me it's more than coincidence. In terms of political opinion, it's Political Cocaine.How did political parties take over the American form of government anyway? There is no provision for them in the Constitution, yet today they control basically all phases of the process of governing in the United States. There must be something that authorized their power. I looked for years and could find nothing. In fact, that is how they grew into their power. In spite of the fact that nothing authorizes them, there is also nothing that makes political parties illegal, another parallel to cocaine historically. Cocaine was perfectly legal in the United States until the early part of the 20th century. Coca-Cola started off as "cocaine-a-cola" until cocaine was made illegal in 1914!Although nothing authorized political parties in the American form of government, the fact that they were not prohibited allowed them to develop. Ironically, in light of the power they have today, the first party, the Democratic-Republican Party, was organized primarily to oppose the political power that was being assembled by the Federalists. As a result, the Democratic-Republicans are also known as the Anti-Federalists. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison saw the independence they had worked for slipping away, as the merchants and business class were building a stronger government primarily to encourage commerce. The revolution seemed doomed to becoming irrelevant.Again, how ironic: the two-party system arose to lessen the power of big money and its influence on the government! The one-word definition of the word "bastard" is illegitimate. As such, it would be a literal interpretation of the term to call political parties, lobbyists, and political action committees bastards. As many people consider the word improper, I will refrain from using it throughout this book, but I absolutely believe it to be true: there is no legal authorization for the political parties, or their children the lobbyists and political action committees. Bastards all. They exist only because there is no legislation making them illegal. Such legislation could happen. It wouldn't even take an amendment!Believing either political party will fix the system is remaining in old habits without thinking, a mild form of addiction. The political parties are the problem.Unfortunately, as the elimination of political parties in the United States is extremely unlikely, a course of action is needed that will have positive results and limit the power of the existing political parties. My current day job is as safety manager for an oilfield service company. One of the things I like most about working with safety is better understanding hazard recognition, then eliminating or mitigating. Obviously, if a hazard can be eliminated, that is the first choice. As the political system has become a hazard to us all, can we eliminate political parties? No. So we must mitigate! We must work to minimize the hazard so it doesn't bring about a negative result, the most negative being death. Unfortunately, the death of democracy doesn't seem that much of a stretch these days.The two-party system is a primary reason for the "dumbing down" of America. The real powers of the two-party system don't want well-informed citizens making their own decisions; they want over-simplified perspectives with catchy phrases that can be repeated easily without deep thought or even actual facts!

Reviews

******
- Verified Buyer
North Dakota author Art Rude taught school and coached and is now is the Safety Manager for Stellar Field Service where he teaches and coaches safety. He has had a state-level job as the Public Relations and Fund-Raising Director for the North Dakota Democratic PartyThe thoughts presented in this fascinating and challenging book are best stated by Art in his initial chapter – ‘If the United States were invaded by any foreign entity, the world would discover the real power of the Second Amendment today. Americans would literally be up in arms, and the world would see the most powerful and best-armed guerrilla warfare ever! Unfortunately, America has been invaded and conquered. Because it was internal, devious, and subtle, the population has accepted it. America has been conquered by politicians. The American system of government was designed to be run by citizens who gave of their time to do public service and return to their regular lives. But elected officials became politicians and organized themselves into clubs – parties – to build power and influence for themselves. They gradually became professionals, exploiting some intentional omissions in the Constitution of 1787. Nothing in the Constitution created political parties, and there was also nothing making them illegal. Does anybody seriously think the collection of presidential candidates of 2016 (or any of today’s political leaders, for that matter) could have initiated a government for the United States anywhere near the quality of what the Founding Fathers put together? Me neither. It was a different time. The Age of Enlightenment was a most wonderful period in many ways. People valued learning. In fact, as a former teacher of physical science – introductory chemistry and physics, as is commonly taught to ninth graders – I can attest that many of the basic principles taught in these sciences came from that age, not from scientists, as we would assume today. The wealthy of that day felt an obligation to contribute to the larger good of society, having the time, resources, and a remarkable fascination with this new thing called science. As a result, many of the basics were discovered by “enlightened” wealthy seeking answers and desiring truth about how the world really worked, apart from religious precepts and ancient assumptions. The Founding Fathers were a product of this “enlightened” mentality. Those Americans now referred to as Founding Fathers thought about making a country that was the summation of the best ideas from history of how to govern equitably with the maximum of personal freedom. James Madison was the one who did his homework preparing for the Constitutional Convention. Discussions Madison had with Thomas Jefferson were key to development of the American Constitution of 1787. As Jefferson was serving as the ambassador of our young nation to France, the responsibility to take the plan to the convention was Madison’s. What he presented is known as the Virginia Plan….‘And from that informed history is an examination of how the political parties have essentially negated ‘government by the people’ and replaced it in government by the privileged/moneyed/powerful ‘elected’ representatives. Or as he so adeptly dates, ‘What chance does America, the land of the free, have if freedom of speech is reduced to everything but the discussion of our own governance? People are afraid to talk politics! It’s never a discussion unless you’re with people of like persuasion. So let’s discuss, with boundaries. No traditional polar arguments allowed; limit discussion to how to make political party power go away, as intended by the Constitution. I would love it if political parties could be eliminated, but in the safety game, if you can’t eliminate, mitigate! People who bring the level of the discussion down to the level of partisan politics arguments should be asked to leave. Try again, next time, if you can be civil. Let’s discuss multiparty systems, choice in the marketplace, and go for some real choice in America! You can change America for the better if you choose to. It won’t be done through the Republican or Democratic parties, they are the problem.’Read and think – especially right now at this moment in our history. Grady Harp, December 18
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Allow cookies", you consent to our use of cookies. More Information see our Privacy Policy.
Top